FIRST ORDER? GET 20% OFF TODAY — Use Code FIRST20

Qualified Writers at Your Service

✍️ Experienced professional writers. ✅ Guaranteed grades.

19+ Years in UK | 110,039 UK Papers | 120 UK Writers | Zero AI & 100% Human-Written
🎓 Top Grades — Just a Click Away
🔥

Stop losing sleep over deadlines — the grade you’ve worked so hard for is just one click away!

🚀
📄 Get Your Instant Quote in 30 Seconds — No Signup Required
Please fill in every field to continue.
No AI Used100% human-written
Guaranteed Gradesor your money back
Your Data SafeUK GDPR-compliant
Free Turnitin Reportwith every order
🏆 Trusted Since 2007

Home » Blog » Systematic vs Narrative Literature Review | EasyMarks

Academic Writing Tips

Systematic vs Narrative Literature Review

Two very different ways to review the literature, and when to use each.

7 min read · Written by UK academic writers

Quick Answer

A systematic literature review follows a strict, transparent protocol to find and appraise all relevant studies on a specific question, while a narrative review surveys the literature more flexibly to give a broad overview. Systematic reviews are more rigorous; narrative reviews are broader and more interpretive.

Not all literature reviews are the same, and choosing the right type matters for your dissertation. This guide explains the two main kinds and how to decide between them.

What a Narrative Review Is

A narrative review surveys and synthesises the literature on a topic in a flexible way, giving a broad overview and building an argument. Most undergraduate and many master's dissertations use this type.

What a Systematic Review Is

A systematic review answers a focused question by following a strict, transparent protocol to search, select and appraise all relevant studies, minimising bias. It is common in health sciences and evidence-based fields.

  • Pre-defined search strategy and criteria
  • Transparent, reproducible selection process
  • Critical appraisal of study quality

Compare Strengths and Limitations

Systematic reviews are rigorous and reproducible but time-consuming and narrow. Narrative reviews are broad and flexible but more prone to selection bias.

How to Choose

Choose a systematic review when you have a focused question and need rigour, and a narrative review when you need a broad overview to frame your study. Your discipline and time will guide you.

Check Your Requirements

Some courses specify the type of review expected. Confirm with your supervisor, as a systematic review is a major undertaking that needs planning from the start.

Key Takeaways
  • Narrative reviews give a broad, flexible overview
  • Systematic reviews follow a strict, transparent protocol
  • Systematic reviews are rigorous but time-consuming
  • Choose based on your question, discipline and time
  • Confirm which type your course requires

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a systematic and a narrative review?

A systematic review follows a strict protocol to answer a focused question; a narrative review surveys the literature more flexibly and broadly.

Which type should I use in my dissertation?

It depends on your question, discipline and time; many dissertations use a narrative review, while health fields often require systematic ones.

Is a systematic review harder?

Generally yes. It is more rigorous and time-consuming and needs careful planning from the outset.

Can I do a systematic review alone?

It is demanding for a solo student, so plan carefully and confirm feasibility with your supervisor.

Need a Hand With Your Essay?

Let a qualified UK writer help you plan, write or polish your work. Order online and get 20% OFF your first order.

Order Online — Get 20% OFF →